<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roller leaves the nest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/05/04/749/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/05/04/749</link>
	<description>Jeff Potts on ECM, portals, search, collaboration, and a bunch of personal stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: siddharth</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/05/04/749/comment-page-1#comment-29297</link>
		<dc:creator>siddharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/05/04/749#comment-29297</guid>
		<description>Can u plz explain how have u integrated Liferay with Apache Roller 4.0 ? We want you to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can u plz explain how have u integrated Liferay with Apache Roller 4.0 ? We want you to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Newton</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/05/04/749/comment-page-1#comment-3447</link>
		<dc:creator>John Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/05/04/749#comment-3447</guid>
		<description>Sounds great. Maybe we can share the details of how the stack fits together in a podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great. Maybe we can share the details of how the stack fits together in a podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Eckman</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/05/04/749/comment-page-1#comment-3113</link>
		<dc:creator>John Eckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 17:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/05/04/749#comment-3113</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve long thought it would make good sense to break up the functionality generally provided by blog software into distinct interfaces - separate authoring, presentation, commenting, and moderation into distinct modules that can be run on different servers in different tiers. 

Most blog software exposes the posting API out to the public when there&#039;s really no reason for that. Of course you can password protect it and such, but why even have that authoring code running on a server in the DMZ? 

Similarly, why not have the code that accepts comments in from end users running on a web-exposed machine, but have the moderation functions running in a separate execution environment? 

This would allow better scaling of the pieces that scale faster and also better separate the security contexts of the applications.  

Perhaps Roller&#039;s a good candidate for this kind of approach?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long thought it would make good sense to break up the functionality generally provided by blog software into distinct interfaces &#8211; separate authoring, presentation, commenting, and moderation into distinct modules that can be run on different servers in different tiers. </p>
<p>Most blog software exposes the posting API out to the public when there&#8217;s really no reason for that. Of course you can password protect it and such, but why even have that authoring code running on a server in the DMZ? </p>
<p>Similarly, why not have the code that accepts comments in from end users running on a web-exposed machine, but have the moderation functions running in a separate execution environment? </p>
<p>This would allow better scaling of the pieces that scale faster and also better separate the security contexts of the applications.  </p>
<p>Perhaps Roller&#8217;s a good candidate for this kind of approach?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

