<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making RFP&#8217;s more effective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/12/02/789/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/12/02/789</link>
	<description>Jeff Potts on ECM, portals, search, collaboration, and a bunch of personal stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Everitt</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/12/02/789/comment-page-1#comment-7211</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Everitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2007/12/02/789#comment-7211</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with this post and thanks for sticking your neck out and saying the emperor has no clothes.

Sure, it&#039;s the way the market is structured, and sure, it&#039;s business as usual.  But as you say, it&#039;s a huge expense that produces little value.

I like the approach you outline of a dirt-simple process used to filter the losers instead of select the winners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with this post and thanks for sticking your neck out and saying the emperor has no clothes.</p>
<p>Sure, it&#8217;s the way the market is structured, and sure, it&#8217;s business as usual.  But as you say, it&#8217;s a huge expense that produces little value.</p>
<p>I like the approach you outline of a dirt-simple process used to filter the losers instead of select the winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

