<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kablink press release goes kerplunk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840</link>
	<description>Jeff Potts on ECM, portals, search, collaboration, and a bunch of personal stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Björklund</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840/comment-page-1#comment-25616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Björklund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840#comment-25616</guid>
		<description>Hi Steven,
thanks for your response. I&#039;ll try that once our Server is back up(HDD failure). Is that the same workflow function the Enterprise version has got or some kind of half-finished experimental thing?
Regards,
Jonas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steven,<br />
thanks for your response. I&#8217;ll try that once our Server is back up(HDD failure). Is that the same workflow function the Enterprise version has got or some kind of half-finished experimental thing?<br />
Regards,<br />
Jonas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840/comment-page-1#comment-24718</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840#comment-24718</guid>
		<description>Hi Ajay, Jonas

Kablink is open source and does contain workflow abilities.  These were added for the kablink release.

Previously the product was known as icecore - this older release has no workflow functionality.  

To get workflow at present I believe you still have to download the kablink source and build the install using &quot;ant&quot; (Java build tool).   Full installs only exist at present for Icecore.

Looking good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ajay, Jonas</p>
<p>Kablink is open source and does contain workflow abilities.  These were added for the kablink release.</p>
<p>Previously the product was known as icecore &#8211; this older release has no workflow functionality.  </p>
<p>To get workflow at present I believe you still have to download the kablink source and build the install using &#8220;ant&#8221; (Java build tool).   Full installs only exist at present for Icecore.</p>
<p>Looking good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Björklund</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840/comment-page-1#comment-23630</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Björklund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840#comment-23630</guid>
		<description>and... it&#039;s not even stated clearly anywhere in the Documentation! I seriously think this is just (yet another) attempt of driving users into frustration so they purchase the Enterprise version. The other features aren&#039;t really documented that well either. And... can somebody show me a changelog of that project... clearly not.

Well it looked promising, 

thanks but no thanks.
jonas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and&#8230; it&#8217;s not even stated clearly anywhere in the Documentation! I seriously think this is just (yet another) attempt of driving users into frustration so they purchase the Enterprise version. The other features aren&#8217;t really documented that well either. And&#8230; can somebody show me a changelog of that project&#8230; clearly not.</p>
<p>Well it looked promising, </p>
<p>thanks but no thanks.<br />
jonas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay Wazir</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840/comment-page-1#comment-19788</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay Wazir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840#comment-19788</guid>
		<description>Hi Brent,
You are missing the point. The point is &quot;Open Source&quot;

The workflow does not exist in Open Source version
Ajay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brent,<br />
You are missing the point. The point is &#8220;Open Source&#8221;</p>
<p>The workflow does not exist in Open Source version<br />
Ajay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent McConnell</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840/comment-page-1#comment-16318</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent McConnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/07/22/840#comment-16318</guid>
		<description>I am the Community Manager for Kablink and would like to  describe what it is we feel we do uniquely.  First off, try the software so that you understand the differences between Kablink and the other products you mentioned.  I think we are unique in our offering.  We have team software that integrates lots of social networking features AND allows users to create workflows for the business objects in the system via a user friendly UI.  Administrators don&#039;t have to define workflows, users get to.  Of course other products integrate workflow, but I haven&#039;t seen any that have the built in team and collaboration feature set Kablink does that also offers an integrated user friendly UI.  Again, I suggest giving it a try.  

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the Community Manager for Kablink and would like to  describe what it is we feel we do uniquely.  First off, try the software so that you understand the differences between Kablink and the other products you mentioned.  I think we are unique in our offering.  We have team software that integrates lots of social networking features AND allows users to create workflows for the business objects in the system via a user friendly UI.  Administrators don&#8217;t have to define workflows, users get to.  Of course other products integrate workflow, but I haven&#8217;t seen any that have the built in team and collaboration feature set Kablink does that also offers an integrated user friendly UI.  Again, I suggest giving it a try.  </p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

