<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding the differences between Alfresco&#8217;s repository implementations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038</link>
	<description>Jeff Potts on ECM, portals, search, collaboration, and a bunch of personal stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:25:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfresco Forge: Blogs</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-44553</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfresco Forge: Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-44553</guid>
		<description>[...] Alfresco will add functionality to the DM repository until it is on par with the AVM (See “What are the differences…“). What then? The AVM will continue to be supported, but if I were placing bets, I would not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alfresco will add functionality to the DM repository until it is on par with the AVM (See “What are the differences…“). What then? The AVM will continue to be supported, but if I were placing bets, I would not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Five Alfresco Roadmap Takeaways &#124; ecmarchitect.com</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-44373</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Five Alfresco Roadmap Takeaways &#124; ecmarchitect.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-44373</guid>
		<description>[...] Alfresco will add functionality to the DM repository until it is on par with the AVM (See &#8220;What are the differences…&#8220;). What then? The AVM will continue to be supported, but if I were placing bets, I would not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alfresco will add functionality to the DM repository until it is on par with the AVM (See &#8220;What are the differences…&#8220;). What then? The AVM will continue to be supported, but if I were placing bets, I would not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Januário</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-40719</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Januário</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-40719</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff,
I would like start to give you congratulations by your great book and articles, your write it&#039;s very clear and simple. 

I have a question about versioning, by default the alfresco doesn&#039;t keep versioning of the properties created in the custom model.

I have created a set of actions to create my own versioning of the properties, but that doesn&#039;t seem to be the better solutions.
It&#039;s possible to configure alfresco to keep property versioning? It&#039;s very strange alfresco doesn&#039;t support it. I haven&#039;t seen nothing about this.

regards

Keep the good work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,<br />
I would like start to give you congratulations by your great book and articles, your write it&#8217;s very clear and simple. </p>
<p>I have a question about versioning, by default the alfresco doesn&#8217;t keep versioning of the properties created in the custom model.</p>
<p>I have created a set of actions to create my own versioning of the properties, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be the better solutions.<br />
It&#8217;s possible to configure alfresco to keep property versioning? It&#8217;s very strange alfresco doesn&#8217;t support it. I haven&#8217;t seen nothing about this.</p>
<p>regards</p>
<p>Keep the good work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpotts</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-40711</link>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-40711</guid>
		<description>Jean-Philippe,

Alfresco WCM is an add-on to the core Alfresco product. It adds the ability to have &quot;web project&quot; folders, sandboxes, preview/virtualization, web forms, and deployment.

Some people choose to manage web content without Alfresco WCM. They use the Alfresco DM store for everything. Obviously, they don&#039;t get to leverage the functionality Alfresco WCM brings to the table when they go that route, but sometimes that&#039;s okay.

You can use the core Alfresco repository to do just about anything. The Alfresco WCM add-on should only be used for WCM use cases. I would never recommend that you try to implement typical document management uses cases solely with Alfresco WCM.

If you have both DM and WCM needs, yes, you can use one Alfresco implementation to do both. One of the nice things about Alfresco is their simple support subscription model--I&#039;m pretty sure one support subscription gets you both DM and WCM, but I don&#039;t work for Alfresco and Optaros is not a reseller, so I&#039;ll defer to Alfresco on the details.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean-Philippe,</p>
<p>Alfresco WCM is an add-on to the core Alfresco product. It adds the ability to have &#8220;web project&#8221; folders, sandboxes, preview/virtualization, web forms, and deployment.</p>
<p>Some people choose to manage web content without Alfresco WCM. They use the Alfresco DM store for everything. Obviously, they don&#8217;t get to leverage the functionality Alfresco WCM brings to the table when they go that route, but sometimes that&#8217;s okay.</p>
<p>You can use the core Alfresco repository to do just about anything. The Alfresco WCM add-on should only be used for WCM use cases. I would never recommend that you try to implement typical document management uses cases solely with Alfresco WCM.</p>
<p>If you have both DM and WCM needs, yes, you can use one Alfresco implementation to do both. One of the nice things about Alfresco is their simple support subscription model&#8211;I&#8217;m pretty sure one support subscription gets you both DM and WCM, but I don&#8217;t work for Alfresco and Optaros is not a reseller, so I&#8217;ll defer to Alfresco on the details.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpotts</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-40710</link>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-40710</guid>
		<description>Martin,

Luckily it isn&#039;t as complex as that. If you are creating content within a web project folder the content is being stored in the WCM store. If you are creating content anywhere else your content is not being stored in the WCM store.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,</p>
<p>Luckily it isn&#8217;t as complex as that. If you are creating content within a web project folder the content is being stored in the WCM store. If you are creating content anywhere else your content is not being stored in the WCM store.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpotts</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-40709</link>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-40709</guid>
		<description>Peter,

Thanks. What I meant by &quot;custom content types are not supported&quot; is that custom types, as defined in your Alfresco DM model, are not supported. Using your web forms as content types only works for web form content, not other types of files you might manage as part of your web site, so they aren&#039;t &quot;true&quot; content types, in my opinion.

People new to Alfresco might make the easy mistake of assuming that the &quot;DM model&quot; is universal, especially given the presence of a type dropdown in the WCM UI.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>Thanks. What I meant by &#8220;custom content types are not supported&#8221; is that custom types, as defined in your Alfresco DM model, are not supported. Using your web forms as content types only works for web form content, not other types of files you might manage as part of your web site, so they aren&#8217;t &#8220;true&#8221; content types, in my opinion.</p>
<p>People new to Alfresco might make the easy mistake of assuming that the &#8220;DM model&#8221; is universal, especially given the presence of a type dropdown in the WCM UI.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Philippe Encausse</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-40696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Philippe Encausse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-40696</guid>
		<description>So if you want DM + WCM you only need Alfresco WCM ? What about mixing both ?

What about commercial opensource pricing ? Is it the same for each product ? 

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if you want DM + WCM you only need Alfresco WCM ? What about mixing both ?</p>
<p>What about commercial opensource pricing ? Is it the same for each product ? </p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Wildam</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-40695</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Wildam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-40695</guid>
		<description>Can you please give me a hint, how I can find out if a document has been stored in DM or WCM.

Or does it depend on the content type - so if I use inline HTML or text content, is then WCM used and for uploading a PDF for instance DM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please give me a hint, how I can find out if a document has been stored in DM or WCM.</p>
<p>Or does it depend on the content type &#8211; so if I use inline HTML or text content, is then WCM used and for uploading a PDF for instance DM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Monks</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/08/31/1038/comment-page-1#comment-40690</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Monks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=1038#comment-40690</guid>
		<description>Nice post!

One minor nit-pick: it&#039;s not entirely accurate to say &quot;In Alfresco WCM, custom content types are not supported.&quot;- the next sentence is in fact a more accurate summary: &quot;In WCM, your content type is your web form.&quot;.

Perhaps a statement like &quot;In Alfresco WCM, DM-style metadata types are not supported, and are instead supplanted by XML Schema-backed content types (Web Forms).&quot; would be clearer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post!</p>
<p>One minor nit-pick: it&#8217;s not entirely accurate to say &#8220;In Alfresco WCM, custom content types are not supported.&#8221;- the next sentence is in fact a more accurate summary: &#8220;In WCM, your content type is your web form.&#8221;.</p>
<p>Perhaps a statement like &#8220;In Alfresco WCM, DM-style metadata types are not supported, and are instead supplanted by XML Schema-backed content types (Web Forms).&#8221; would be clearer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
