<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ecmarchitect.com &#187; Corporate Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecmarchitect.com/categories/corporate-blogging/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecmarchitect.com</link>
	<description>Jeff Potts on ECM, portals, search, collaboration, and a bunch of personal stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:19:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Where are the &#8220;internal blog initiatives&#8221; case studies?</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/16/621</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/16/621#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 02:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday was my first day at the KMWorld and Intranets 2005 Conference. I spent most of the day in the Collaboration track which, on this day, was focused heavily on blogs and wikis. There were a couple of good nuggets in the presentations but I guess I was disappointed in the track overall. Or maybe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday was my first day at the KMWorld and Intranets 2005 Conference. I spent most of the day in the Collaboration track which, on this day, was focused heavily on blogs and wikis.</p>
<p>There were a couple of good nuggets in the presentations but I guess I was disappointed in the track overall. Or maybe what I was really disappointed in was the apparent lack of progress corporations have made incorporating internal blogs into overall Knowledge Management initiatives.</p>
<p>It is unfair of me to generalize that because there were no case studies from real corporations Corporate America must not be doing enough to leverage technologies like blogs, wikis, and RSS as a meaningful component of their KM program. And, there were a couple of examples given of companies, like IBM, that are doing this. But this <em>is</em> the <em>KM World</em> conference, is it not? If companies had compelling stories to tell around internal blogging initiatives where would they be presented if not here?</p>
<p>My company is a small services firm so our experience may not be transferrable to companies the size of our typical client. But, for what it is worth, <a href="/archives/2004/02/04/418">here</a> is an old post I wrote on why I think our internal blog initiative failed. At some point, I hope to correct these mistakes and take another run at it. Maybe by then many others will have shared their stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/16/621/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Timely reference to personal knowledge management tools</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/18/601</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/18/601#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/18/601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a coincidence. Tom and I were just discussing his (never-ending) search for a better approach to personal knowledge management. We specifically talked about Personal Brain, which is a tool he tried a while back and abandoned, just like McGee . Maybe one of the two tools McGee mentions in this post will get him [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a coincidence. Tom and I were just discussing his (never-ending) search for a better approach to personal knowledge management. We specifically talked about Personal Brain, which is a tool he tried a while back and abandoned, just like <a href="http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2005/10/17.html#a4711">McGee</a><br />
. Maybe one of the two tools McGee mentions in this post will get him closer to pKM nirvanna. (Neither are open source).</p>
<p>Tom has had some recent success with <a href="http://www.tiddlywikki.com">TiddlyWikki</a>, which is a &#8220;reusable non-linear personal web notebook&#8221; that runs locally and requires no server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/18/601/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things I like about WordPress so far</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/16/598</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/16/598#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/16/598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it has been just under a week since I moved everything over here from Radio. Here&#8217;s what I really like so far: I don&#8217;t have to fire up my laptop to post. I can do it from any networked device. I&#8217;ve got tons of space as opposed to the 40MB included with Radio. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it has been just under a week since I moved everything over here from <a href="http://radio.userland.com/">Radio</a>. Here&#8217;s what I really like so far:</p>
<ul>
<li>I don&#8217;t have to fire up my laptop to post. I can do it from any networked device.</li>
<li>I&#8217;ve got tons of space as opposed to the 40MB included with Radio.</li>
<li>The technology foundation is more intuitive. It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.onlamp.com/">LAMP</a>-based so there are a lot of resources available. Radio Userland is based on Frontier which is not nearly as ubiquitous as LAMP.</li>
<li>Similar to the prior point, I love that it uses a <a href="http://www.mysql.com/">relational back-end</a>. I don&#8217;t have to re-publish pages when I change the look-and-feel. And the model is more like what I&#8217;m used to. Front-end web page talks to back-end database. Simple. I get it.</li>
<li>My aggregator is for aggregating and my blog tool is for blogging. The built-in RSS aggregator in Radio is okay, but I didn&#8217;t want to have to fire up Radio to check my feeds. Sometimes I&#8217;d use <a href="http://sage.mozdev.org/">Sage</a>, but, again, I&#8217;d have to fire up Radio if I came across something post-worthy. Now, I use Sage all of the time&#8211;I hit the bookmarklet to post and I&#8217;m there.</li>
</ul>
<p>In my early days of Radio I thought it might be a good tool to roll out internally. That was before I had been exposed to the server-based blog tools. And, quite honestly, I think I was forgetting the lesson we&#8217;ve all already learned about distributing and maintaining client apps versus running them on a centrally-managed server infrastructure with a thin client.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll grant that it is extremely easy to set up a public blog with Radio. I tweaked my config to publish to both a public site and an internal site and that was straightforward for a technical user. When I think about folks in our sales organization making those same tweaks and maybe wanting to customize their templates, I think about what Walter said to Smokey in The Big Lebowski, &#8220;You are entering a world of pain.&#8221;</p>
<p>I imagine Userland&#8217;s answer to this would be, &#8220;You are right. For a big intranet project you should use Manila, our server-based product.&#8221; Maybe so. But you&#8217;d still have to bone up on Frontier.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m not trying to dog Radio here. I&#8217;m just excited about my choice to switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/16/598/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public-facing corporate blog white paper</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/14/596</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/14/596#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/14/596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a general white paper on good blogging practices. McGee calls it a &#8220;corporate&#8221; blogging resource (his post). But don&#8217;t be confused between a public-facing corporate blog and a blog for internal knowledge management purposes. Still, I agree it is worth a read and probably good to circulate amongst managers who haven&#8217;t drank the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.contentfactor.com/landing/200508/">This</a> is a general white paper on good blogging practices. <a href="http://www.mcgeesmusings.net">McGee</a> calls it a &#8220;corporate&#8221; blogging resource (<a href="http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2005/10/09.html#a4707">his post</a>). But don&#8217;t be confused between a public-facing corporate blog and a blog for internal knowledge management purposes. Still, I agree it is worth a read and probably good to circulate amongst managers who haven&#8217;t drank the kool-aid yet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/14/596/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally&#8230;got it all migrated</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/12/594</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/12/594#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/12/594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay. I think everything is moved over from the old Radio Userland blog. The stories were the most painful due to a lapse in clear-thinking&#8211;at some point I started using MS Word to edit the stories prior to pasting them into Radio. So I had a bunch of Word-specific HTML to clean up. The posts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. I think everything is moved over from the old Radio Userland blog. The stories were the most painful due to a lapse in clear-thinking&#8211;at some point I started using MS Word to edit the stories prior to pasting them into Radio. So I had a bunch of Word-specific HTML to clean up. The posts imported smoothly.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a summary of what I did:</p>
<p>1. Moved images to gallery. This gave me an excuse to try out <a href="http://gallery.menalto.com/">Gallery</a> and gives me a decent way to manage the images I reference from stories and posts.</p>
<p>2. Moved stories by hand, cleaning up HTML and changing out IMG references to gallery. This would have been a decent job for a Perl script but I didn&#8217;t have that many to move. (While prowling around I found some old stories that Radio was no longer publishing for some reason. Thanks, Radio!).</p>
<p>3. Imported mySubscriptions.opml into blogroll.</p>
<p>4. Created categories to match old categories. As it turns out, this wasn&#8217;t necessary. The RSS importer creates categories for imported posts as it needs to.</p>
<p>5. Added rewrite rule to .htaccess to try to address any links in my posts:</p>
<p><code>RewriteRule ^/0117027/categories/xml/([0-9]{4})/(.*).html /newbloglocation/archives/$1/$2 [R=permanent]</code></p>
<p>6. Updated the UTC time offset in my WordPress options. (I just hadn&#8217;t had a chance to do it until now).</p>
<p>7. Edited /www/wp-admin/import-rss.php to tell it the name of the XML file to import.</p>
<p>8. Wrote an XSLT stylesheet to filter unwanted post categories. I was using Radio to post to my public blog as well as an internal server at Navigator. The XSL simply transformed the existing RSS into a &#8220;public&#8221; version without the internal categories. I used Perl to recursively cruise through the Radio backup posts directory structure and transform the XML.</p>
<p>9. Uploaded the transformed RSS files to the site and ran the import-rss.php script.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve probably got more cleanup to do but at least it is all moved over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/12/594/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internal KM post on slashdot</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/11/593</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/11/593#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting thread on Slashdot. Someone asked about capturing, organizing, and sharing knowledge in an IT department and the majority of folks are responding with various wiki tools and open source portals. Although the question was directed at the needs of an IT department, the advice is probably applicable to any department in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting thread on Slashdot. Someone asked about capturing, organizing, and sharing knowledge in an IT department and the majority of folks are responding with various wiki tools and open source portals. Although the question was directed at the needs of an IT department, the advice is probably applicable to any department in an enterprise, provided the UI of the chosen tool scores high in the usability department.</p>
<p><a href="http://c.moreover.com/click/here.pl?r399394154">Knowledge Management for an IT Department?</a>. Slashdot Sep 30 2005 8:25PM GMT [<a href="http://www.moreover.com/rss">Moreover Technologies - Knowledge management news</a>]</p>
<p>The key issues, as I&#8217;ve mentioned before are:</p>
<ul>
<li>it has to be easy to contribute content</li>
<li>it has to be easy to find content (via search and possibly taxonomy browsing)</li>
<li>it has to be secure</li>
<li>it has to have all of the &#8220;-abilities&#8221; (eg, scalability, extensibility, usability, etc.).</li>
</ul>
<p>Something like a combination of blogs, wikis, possibly a document repository, and a search engine for the whole thing ought to do the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/11/593/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs and wikis as KM infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/04/590</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/04/590#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is worth a read. It has definite applicability to corporate use of wiki and blog technology. The key paragraph is The Wiki and the Blog are complimentary companion technologies that together form the core workspace that will allow intelligence officers to share, innovate, adapt, respond, and beâ€”on occasionâ€”brilliant. Blogs will cite Wiki entries. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is worth a read. It has definite applicability to corporate use of wiki and blog technology. The key paragraph is</p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" /></p>
<blockquote style="margin-right: 0px" dir="ltr">
<p align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"></font><font face="Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif"><em>The Wiki and the Blog are complimentary companion technologies that together form the core </em></font><font face="Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif"><em>workspace that will allow intelligence officers to share, innovate, adapt, respond, and beâ€”on </em></font><font face="Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif"><em>occasionâ€”brilliant. Blogs will cite Wiki entries. The occasional brilliant blog comment will </em></font><font face="Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif"><em>shape the Wiki. The Blog will be vibrant, and make many sea changes in real-time. The Wiki, </em></font><font face="Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif"><em>as it matures, will serve as corporate knowledge and will not be as fickle as the Blog. The Wiki </em></font><font face="Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif"><em>will be authoritative in nature, while the Blog will be highly agile. The Blog is personal and </em></font><font face="Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif"><em>opinionated. The Wiki is agreed-upon and corporate.</em></font></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="left" dir="ltr"><font face="Times New Roman"></font><font size="2" face="Arial">Andrus goes on to add additional supporting components to the core of blogs and wikis which consists of search, feedback, and an underlying document repository.</font></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/2005/10/03.html#a4704">The Wiki and the Blog: Toward a Complex Adaptive Intelligence Community</a>. <a href="http://billives.typepad.com/portals_and_km">Bill Ives </a>finds a nice report on the use of new technology within the intelligence community&#8230;</p>
<div style="margin-left: 40px"><a href="http://billives.typepad.com/portals_and_km/2005/09/the_wiki_and_th.html">The Wiki and the Blog: Toward a Complex Adaptive Intelligence Community</a>. Here is an article by Calvin Andrus of the CIA on how they can use blogs and wikis to help them change, <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=755904">The Wiki and the Blog: Toward a Complex Adaptive Intelligence Community</a>, which is not a bad idea. As&#8230; [<a href="http://billives.typepad.com/portals_and_km/">Portals and KM</a>]</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px"></div>
<p>[<a href="http://www.mcgeesmusings.net/">McGee's Musings</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>Note that the Stanford Law School link to the PDF does not require registration.</p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">I definitely like the idea of using the repository as a sort of loosely organized collection point for raw knowledge. At Navigator we call this the &#8220;unstructured data warehouse&#8221;. It needs to be secure and I suppose it needs some amount of organization but the key is to make it easy for employees to contribute, easy to administer, and as open as possible.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">Then, on top of that you add tools to glean intelligence from the warehouse (ie wikis) and a mechanism for expressing opinions about that separately (blogs). Index the whole shooting-match with a search engine and you&#8217;ve got something.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">The final ingredient is incentive. You&#8217;ve got to make it beneficial for employees to leverage this infrastructure (and painful if they don&#8217;t!).</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/10/04/590/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internal blog and wiki survey</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/05/11/552</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/05/11/552#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 19:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gilbane Enterprise Blog Survey. The Gilbane Report recently posted the results of their Survey on Enterprise blog, wiki, and RSS Use. While the survey sample is not representative of a larger population of companies (the survey was voluntary and Gilbane readers are probably ahead of the curve), the results are interesting. Of the 58 respondents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnterContentHere?m=41">Gilbane Enterprise Blog Survey</a>.</p>
<div>The Gilbane Report recently posted the results of their Survey on Enterprise blog, wiki, and RSS Use. While the survey sample is not representative of a larger population of companies (the survey was voluntary and Gilbane readers are probably ahead of the curve), the results are interesting. Of the 58 respondents (mostly from companies under $25MM in annual revenues but 10 from companies of over</div>
<p>By noemail@noemail.org (Seth). [<a href="http://contenthere.blogspot.com">Enter Content Here</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/05/11/552/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog posts via IM</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/05/06/559</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/05/06/559#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 22:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would be a cool corporate blogging feature&#8230; AOL Opens Blog Service to IM Users. Members of AOL Instant Messenger gain connections to the AOL Journals blogging tool, including the ability to send posts through instant messages. [eWEEK Technology News]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir=ltr>This would be a cool corporate blogging feature&#8230;</p>
<blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p><a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1813385,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594">AOL Opens Blog Service to IM Users</a>. Members of AOL Instant Messenger gain connections to the AOL Journals blogging tool, including the ability to send posts through instant messages. [<a href="http://www.eweek.com">eWEEK Technology News</a>]</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/05/06/559/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of portals</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/04/13/532</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/04/13/532#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Technology&#8221; is one of the three converging forces. Under that heading, Charlie notes how blogs and CMS/Portals are converging. Technology: the perfect storm for portals?. Charlie Wood has written a blog entry on the uncertain future of portals. To quote: The enterprise portal industry stands squarely in the path of three converging forces, any one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Technology&#8221; is one of the three converging forces. Under that heading, Charlie notes how blogs and CMS/Portals are converging.</p>
<blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p><a href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/archives/001675.html">Technology: the perfect storm for portals?</a>. Charlie Wood has written a blog entry on the uncertain future of portals. To quote: The enterprise portal industry stands squarely in the path of three converging forces, any one of which could be devastating. Together, they might be fatal&#8230;. [<a href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/">Column Two</a>]</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/04/13/532/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
