<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ecmarchitect.com &#187; Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecmarchitect.com/categories/search/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecmarchitect.com</link>
	<description>Jeff Potts on ECM, portals, search, collaboration, and a bunch of personal stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:19:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Django-Solr open source project</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/02/04/888</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/02/04/888#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Django]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optaros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fellow Optarian Sean Creeley has released a Django-Solr integration as an open source project hosted at Google Code. Django is a Python-based web framework. Apache Solr is essentially an XML and JSON API that sits on top of Apache Lucene. Sean&#8217;s also working on our Django-Alfresco integration. I&#8217;m not sure how this project jumped in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fellow Optarian <a href="http://www.screeley.com">Sean Creeley</a> has released a <a href="http://www.screeley.com/entries/2009/feb/02/django-solr/">Django-Solr integration</a> as an open source project hosted at <a href="http://code.google.com/p/django-solr-search/">Google Code</a>. <a href="http://www.djangoproject.com">Django</a> is a Python-based web framework. <a href="http://lucene.apache.org/solr/">Apache Solr</a> is essentially an XML and JSON API that sits on top of Apache Lucene.</p>
<p>Sean&#8217;s also working on our Django-Alfresco integration. I&#8217;m not sure how this project jumped in front of that one. Guess I need to take Sean out for a beer and see if I can&#8217;t influence the roadmap a bit. (Half-kidding).</p>
<p>If you want to see the Django-Solr stuff in action, take a look at Sean&#8217;s blog. It&#8217;s built using Django and he&#8217;s got a <a href="http://www.screeley.com/search/django/">live example</a> that shows the Solr integration in action.</p>
<p>You can expect several new <a href="http://www.optaros.com">Optaros</a>-sponsored open source projects to become available throughout the year so stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/02/04/888/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two interesting Hibernate projects you should check out</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/02/15/807</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/02/15/807#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/02/15/807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I attended two very interesting Hibernate sessions at JBoss World yesterday. One was on Hibernate Search, the other was Hibernate Shards. Hibernate Search What do you do when your customers add &#8220;Google-like search&#8221; to the list of requirements for the web application you are delivering? With a straight relational back-end, implementing that requirement might be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended two very interesting Hibernate sessions at JBoss World yesterday. One was on Hibernate Search, the other was Hibernate Shards.</p>
<p><strong>Hibernate Search </strong></p>
<p>What do you do when your customers add &#8220;Google-like search&#8221; to the list of requirements for the web application you are delivering? With a straight relational back-end, implementing that requirement might be tougher than you&#8217;d think. Just a few challenges are:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Keyword&#8221; search means you&#8217;re probably going to want to use wildcards which perform poorly.</li>
<li>Your data is scattered across multiple columns. Writing a SQL query to search them all is ugly.</li>
<li>SQL doesn&#8217;t really know how to deal with typical search constructs like proximity, synonyms, or relevance.</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="Hibernate Search Home Page" target="_blank" href="http://www.hibernate.org/410.html">Hibernate Search</a> is the answer. It combines the power of the proven Apache Lucene search engine with the ease of configuration of Hibernate.  Hooking Hibernate Search into your app is a matter of dropping in a couple of JAR files and adding annotations to your classes to describe what should and shouldn&#8217;t be indexed.</p>
<p><strong>Hibernate Shards</strong></p>
<p>What do you do when you can&#8217;t (or don&#8217;t want to) put all of your data in the same relational database? Google&#8217;s word for horizontal partitioning&#8211;taking horizontal slices of your database and storing each slice in a separate physical database&#8211;is called &#8220;sharding&#8221;. Give a few Google engineers passionate about the subject a few months and <a title="Hibernate Shards Home Page" target="_blank" href="http://www.hibernate.org/414.html">Hibernate Shards</a> is the result (Google donated the project to JBoss).</p>
<p>Shards lets you come up with your own scheme for how rows will be partitioned. Each partition is called a shard. Once you&#8217;ve settled on a scheme it&#8217;s a matter of configuration through familiar Hibernate configuration constructs. If you don&#8217;t use any of the out-of-the-box implementations for how to decide which shard to create and find objects on or for how to generate ID&#8217;s, you&#8217;ll have to implement those interfaces as well. Once you&#8217;ve got everything in place, persisting and querying objects works the same way as straight Hibernate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/02/15/807/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to acquire FAST</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/01/08/796</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/01/08/796#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/01/08/796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Microsoft is going to acquire search vendor FAST. Read CMSWatch coverage here and John Newton&#8217;s here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Microsoft is going to acquire search vendor FAST. Read CMSWatch coverage <a target="_blank" title="CMSWatch post on MS acquisition of FAST" href="http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1112-That-was-FAST:-Microsoft-to-acquire-Norwegian-search-vendor?source=RSS">here</a> and John Newton&#8217;s <a target="_blank" title="John Newton's thoughts on MS acquisition of FAST" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ContentLog/~3/213347568/going-nowhere-f.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2008/01/08/796/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Up-coming AIIM webinars on search, BPM</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2006/04/18/678</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2006/04/18/678#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2006/04/18/678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AIIM webinars can be a mixed bag but two are coming up that might be worthwhile: &#8220;Redefining Enterprise Search&#8221;, sponsored by FAST on 4/26 and &#8220;BPM: When is Workflow Not Enough&#8221;, sponsored by Doculabs on 5/10. Register for both online at http://www.aiim.org/webinars.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIIM webinars can be a mixed bag but two are coming up that might be worthwhile: &#8220;Redefining Enterprise Search&#8221;, sponsored by FAST on 4/26 and &#8220;BPM: When is Workflow Not Enough&#8221;, sponsored by Doculabs on 5/10. Register for both online at <a href="http://www.aiim.org/webinars">http://www.aiim.org/webinars</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2006/04/18/678/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Documentum ECI can now call Google desktop</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2006/01/19/644</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2006/01/19/644#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Documentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2006/01/19/644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EMC Documentum ECI, a federated search technology, has added the ability to search Google Desktop. EMC press release.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMC Documentum ECI, a federated search technology, has added the ability to search Google Desktop. <a href="http://www.emc.com/news/emc_releases/showRelease.jsp?id=3811&#038;l=en&#038;c=US">EMC press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2006/01/19/644/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trends: Chill wind continues to blow for FAST</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/12/09/634</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/12/09/634#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 06:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/12/09/634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trends: Chill wind continues to blow for FAST[CMSWatch]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/583-Chill-wind-continues-to-blow-for-FAST?source=RSS">Trends: Chill wind continues to blow for FAST</a>[<a href="http://www.cmswatch.com">CMSWatch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/12/09/634/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alfresco, Plone make EContent 100</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/28/628</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/28/628#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alfresco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/28/628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EContent Magazine has posted the EContent 100, an annual list of &#8220;&#8230;companies that matter most in the digital content industry&#8221;. Notable newcomers include open source ECM and Portal platforms Alfresco and Plone. Wiki software provider, SocialText, returns for a second year. EMC Software (Documentum), a long-time EContent 100 stalwart, having appeared every year since 2001, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.econtentmag.com">EContent Magazine</a> has posted the <a href="http://www.econtentmag.com/EContent100/">EContent 100</a>, an annual list of &#8220;&#8230;companies that matter most in the digital content industry&#8221;.</p>
<p>Notable newcomers include open source ECM and Portal platforms <a href="http://www.alfresco.org/">Alfresco</a> and <a href="http://plone.org/">Plone</a>. Wiki software provider, <a href="http://www.socialtext.com/">SocialText</a>, returns for a second year.</p>
<p>EMC Software (Documentum), a long-time EContent 100 stalwart, having appeared every year since 2001, did not make the 2005 list, but Autonomy, now with a three-peat, did.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our goal was to be sure that those who make the list again and again donâ€™t do so out of habit or mindshare, but rather because they continue to innovate and deliver products and services that further the evolution of digital content,&#8221; said Michelle Manafy, Editor of EContent magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/28/628/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Got clarification on the &#8220;Free Google Mini&#8221; offer</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/22/627</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/22/627#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently got some clarification from Google on their offer of a free Google Mini Search Appliance. If you buy the regular Google Search Appliance they&#8217;ll give you a free Mini. The idea is that you might use the Search Appliance for your intranet and your free Mini for your internet site. If that doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently got some clarification from Google on their <a href="http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/09/618">offer</a> of a free Google Mini Search Appliance. If you buy the regular Google Search Appliance they&#8217;ll give you a free Mini. The idea is that you might use the Search Appliance for your intranet and your free Mini for your internet site. If that doesn&#8217;t appeal to you they&#8217;ll knock the $3k off the cost of your Search Appliance.</p>
<p>If you do get a Mini, make sure you are up-to-date on patches. <a href="http://www.eweek.com">eWeek</a> is reporting a <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1891796,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594">security flaw</a> in the device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/22/627/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Goes after Verity Customers</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/09/618</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/09/618#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/09/618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note the interesting tidbit, &#8220;&#8230;on Tuesday Google began giving away its least expensive Google corporate search product, its Mini, to new Google Enterprise customers&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m looking into the details. The price on the Mini has fallen to $2995 but free doesn&#8217;t seem likely. Google Goes after Verity Customers Of course, Google could smell blood in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note the interesting tidbit, &#8220;&#8230;on Tuesday Google began giving away its least expensive Google corporate search product, its Mini, to new Google Enterprise customers&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m looking into the details. The price on the Mini has fallen to $2995 but free doesn&#8217;t seem likely.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1883239,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594">Google Goes after Verity Customers</a></p>
<p>Of course, Google could smell blood in the water and what better way to give a boost to its customer base than to give away its cheapest appliance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/09/618/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search IBM Information Integrator from Google</title>
		<link>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/07/616</link>
		<comments>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/07/616#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/07/616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a good example of a company taking advantage of a client that gets deployed virally rather than by the IT department&#8230; Google, IBM Team Up on PC desktop search]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good example of a company taking advantage of a client that gets deployed virally rather than by the IT department&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://gilbane.com/news.pl/7/news.html#3999">Google, IBM Team Up on PC desktop search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2005/11/07/616/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
